🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is observed is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to scrub Black history and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.